Skip to content
iQ 360
An integrated communications agency
360
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Capabilities
  • About
  • Join Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
We build + protect reputations

ESG in 2023: Part 2

01.18.23 | by Lori Teranishi
  • Share via
ESG, Insights
  • Share via

This is the second of three posts intended to provide an overview to help leaders make ESG decisions in this new year. The last post reviewed 2022’s extreme weather events exacerbated by global warming. This one will review measures elected officials, business leaders and government officials took last year to try to prevent catastrophic climate change. The third blog will offer a framework to help leaders determine how aggressively their organizations should pursue an ESG agenda.

 

ESG in 2022: The Human Half of the Picture

From a U.S. perspective, four major ESG events unfolded last year:

  • The U.S. Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act
  • The United Nations Climate Conference (COP 27) convened in Egypt
  • The war in Ukraine created challenges for pro-climate energy policies
  • The politicization of ESG escalated sharply

 

The U.S. Congress Passed the Inflation Reduction Act

The Inflation Reduction Act provides nearly $370 billion in funding and tax credits for climate and clean energy provisions. Characterized as the largest-ever federal investment in combatting the climate crisis, the bill is expected to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by about 40% by 2030.

The bill directs billions of dollars to support states’ climate efforts, including building electrification, energy efficiency initiatives, port electrification, shifting to heavy-duty electric vehicles, and charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. It includes further billions to modernize the electric grid, build a nationwide network of electric vehicle chargers, strengthen the battery supply chain, expand public transit and passenger rail, invest in new clean energy and emissions reduction technologies, improve resilience in physical and natural systems, and clean up legacy pollution in communities across the country.

In addition to implementation of the act, the federal government will soon require companies with which it does business to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and commit to a science-based climate target. Also, the US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) will soon publish rules to require publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions rates.

On the world stage, passage of the bill did much to restore America’s leadership position in the fight against climate change. Doubt arose about the U.S.’s commitment to sustainability when the Trump administration withdrew from the Paris (COP) Agreement in 2017. Despite President Biden rejoining the agreement on his inauguration day in 2021, skepticism remained because U.S. emissions continued to grow.

Because The Inflation Reduction Act is certain to decrease emissions, leaders of other nations now have stronger defenses of their own environmental agendas and incentive to press forward aggressively, if only to capitalize on the new technologies and industries that will emerge as American investment fuels business transformation in many sectors.

 

United Nations Climate Conference (COP 27)

Credit: Wired

Given its purported critical role in the effort to prevent environmental catastrophe, the climate summit in Sharm el-Sheik, Egypt, was ultimately unimpressive and uninspiring. It fueled the growing perception that COP is mostly a meeting of bureaucrats who reach agreement on programs with limited follow-through.

After agreeing in Glasgow (COP 26) to cut emissions and to provide massive funding to help poor countries deal with climate change, most of the developed nations took little action. Promised funding of $100 billion per year is barely trickling in.

To underscore the growing disillusionment with the COP meetings, famed environmental activist Greta Thunberg did not bother to travel to Egypt, saying, “The COPs are mainly used as an opportunity for leaders and people in power to get attention, using many different kinds of greenwashing.”

The COP conference earned some credibility by a last-minute agreement on “Loss and Damage,” a long-sought priority for developing nations, which contribute the least to climate change but suffer the most from its impact. The United States and other major industrialized nations have for years resisted a loss and damage mechanism because they wanted to avoid financial promises that the domestic political climate precludes delivering.

The details to the Loss and Damage agreement are minimal, as there is disagreement about which nations will contribute to the fund, which will receive funding, how funds can and cannot be applied, and much more. Given how slowly signatories to other COP agreements have acted, skepticism about the timing and eventual impact of this new mechanism is understandable.

 

“The COPs are mainly used as an opportunity for leaders and people in power to get attention, using many different kinds of greenwashing.”

 

The War in Ukraine Creates Challenges for Pro-Climate Energy Policies

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to a collapse of its energy relationship with Western Europe, upset the world energy market and prompted changes in U.S. policy. Most notably, the Biden administration had to reverse its anti-Big Oil position to encourage increased domestic production and allow oil production agreements with Ecuador. It also was compelled sell 180 million barrels of oil from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve to increase gas availability in the U.S.

This White House emphasis on increasing oil availability was characterized by critics as proof that the attacks on fossil fuel associated with ESG are flawed and that green energy is not adequate to meet today’s fuel needs. This apparent rebuttal to ESG thinking emboldened attacks primarily from conservatives in the United States and other countries against progressives who are strongly associated with ESG.

 

A Sharp Escalation in the Politicization of ESG

The energy policy contradictions created by the war in Ukraine provided a foundation for conservative media and political attacks on ESG as election fervor (and spending) rose over the months leading to America’s November elections.

Corporations that have been trying to adopt ESG programs, in part to appease their growing numbers of activist employees articulating ESG concerns, are becoming popular targets for conservative critics who claim corporate leaders are straying from their core business responsibility by catering to the demands of “woke” progressives.

Some “red” states are beginning to take their state pension funds out of financial firms whose ESG stances are being characterized as anti-fossil fuel. In August 19 state attorney generals wrote a letter to BlackRock – the asset management firm renowned for its pro-ESG advocacy – accusing the company of violating its fiduciary responsibility by using ESG as one of its investment criteria, which “force the phase-out of fossil fuels, increase energy prices, drive inflation and weaken the national security of the United States.”

BlackRock replied with a letter stoutly refuting the accusations.

Conservatives were targeting ESG’s social component more than its environmental component. At the local, state and federal level, conservative candidates railed against the teaching of critical race theory, trans student education policies, pro-LGBT policies, racial consideration in admissions, and other “hot-button” issues regarding the way marginalized people are treated.

Credit: Bloomberg

Perhaps the dispute which most alarmed business leaders was Disney’s dogfight with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. After Florida passed its “Don’t Say Gay” legislation that prohibits elementary school discussion about sexual orientation and gender identity, Disney was prodded by its employees to speak out in opposition. In apparent retaliation, Florida lawmakers passed a law eliminating Disney’s special tax and self-ruling status.

As intended, this immediate and substantive political retaliation drew the attention of many CEOs, causing some to consider reducing the visibility of their embrace of ESG. With Republicans now in control of the House of Representatives and with President Biden up for reelection, they must consider that ESG will become weaponized to even greater threat levels.

In his post-election victory speech in November, Governor DeSantis declared “Florida is where woke goes to die,” perhaps positioning himself for a rumored presidential run for office in 2024. This is precisely the type of polarized sentiment that will continue to define the current ESG landscape that organizations must navigate.

 

In case you missed it, read part one of our three-part ESG in 2023 series.

  • Share via

Top Picks for You


February 1, 2023

ESG in 2023: Part 3 →

January 11, 2023

ESG in 2023: Part 1 →

Post navigation

 ESG in 2023: Part 1
Welcome iQ 360’s New Senior Account Manager, Katie Arita-Chang 

Categories

C-Suite
Tactics & Tips
Visual Communication
iQ Insights

Must Reads

March 11, 2020

Communicating During Times of Uncertainty →

April 15, 2020

Why Internal Communication Should be Your Top Priority →

October 9, 2019

The Real Value of Diversity in Marketing →

Stay in the know with our quarterly newsletter
Loading...
iQ 360

We believe in the power of communication to change the world

808.536.2729
Privacy Policy | ©2023 iQ 360 Inc. All rights reserved.
We are a certified minority- and woman-owned business.
iQ 360

We believe in the power of communication to change the world

808.536.2729
Privacy Policy
©2023 iQ 360 Inc. All rights reserved.

We are a certified minority- and woman-owned business.

Privacy Policy

Last updated on June 5, 2018.

 

This privacy policy explains our collection, use, disclosure, retention, and protection of personal information collected through our website, www.iq360inc.com (the “Website”).

 

  1. Information We Collect

We collect personally identifiable information about you, including your name, email address, and phone number, when you send an inquiry to us on the contact form on the Website.

 

  1. How We Use Your Information

We will use your information only to respond to you regarding the reason you contacted us. We will contact you by the means by that you have consented to us contacting you, as you indicate when you submit an inquiry to us via the Website.  We will not share your information with any third party outside of our organization.  We do not send any promotional emails; however, we may contact you via email in the future to tell you about changes to this privacy policy.

 

  1. Cookies

 

  1. Storage of Information

Personally identifiable information that you submit to us via the Website is processed and stored, if at all, in the United States.  We will not keep your personal data for longer than is necessary for the purposes for which it was collected.  We determine the retention period based on the purpose for which the information was obtained, our legal obligations, and our technical and business requirements. 

 

  1. Your Access to and Control Over Information

You have the right to opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. You may do the following at any time by contacting us via info@iq360.inc.com or 808-536-2729:

  • See what data we have about you, if any.
  • Change/correct any data we have about you.
  • Have us delete any data we have about you.
  • Express any concern you have about our use of your data or if you feel that we are not abiding by this privacy policy.

  

  1. Security

We take precautions to protect your information. When you submit sensitive information via the Website, your information is protected both online and offline. Only employees who need the information to perform a specific job (for example, customer service) are granted access to personally identifiable information. The computers/servers in which we store personally identifiable information are kept in a secure environment.

 

  1. Updates to This Statement

This privacy policy may be subject to updates.  Any material future changes or additions to the processing of personal information as described in this privacy policy affecting you will be communicated to you through an appropriate channel.  For example, we may email you to let you know about updates to the privacy policy.

 

 

Subscribe

Emails collected through this form will be used for marketing and business updates. We are the sole owners of the information collected on this site. We only have access to information that you voluntarily give us. We will not sell or rent this information to anyone. You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time by contacting us via the email address or phone number given on our website. Please see our privacy policy for full details.